There are various names, are there not, for the act of running your name(s) through a Google search: vanity googling, auto-googling, and so on. I do this from time to time, looking in particularly for any citations of my work and also, of course, the possibility that someone has started a hate-blog about me (some strange part of my mind remains ever fourteen; one can never be too vigilant).
A little while ago I came across this article, written for a 2001 issue of a periodical then newly online. My contribution was extracted from the first chapter of my then-recently-submitted thesis, and its publication a chance to share a part of a trawling of my field that I thought would likely never see the light of day elsewhere, on account of its length.
[click to continue…]
My fellow Norwich Terrier breeder and Facebook friend Magda has included me in the “25 things” exercise that is currently meshing with the tag option on Facebook’s notes. This is the rubric
Rules: Once you’ve been tagged, you are supposed to write a note with 25 random things, facts, habits, or goals about you. At the end, choose 25 people to be tagged. You have to tag the person who tagged you. If I tagged you, it’s because I want to know more about you.
I am modifying this a little: since my Facebook notes are syndicated from my webpages, I am making the original post there, and since my Facebook friends are from so many different times and facets of my life, I am going to write five paragraphs for five things. Those of you who’ve been my students will know my mantra “an academic paragraph is usually around five sentences”, and it’s time for me to test it here. I will reserve the option to tag, knowing that many among you dislike it.
[click to continue…]
And now I have this exquisite space in which to speak, I must do so. Back at work since yesterday, I’m currently in that strange dream space of resetting my body clock. It took very little time to revert to my old ways, rising late morning and retiring in the early morning. Doing so felt like encountering a younger, earlier version of my self, who might be crouching in the back bedroom adding files one by one to her new third-generation iPod, or some similarly nocturnal activity.* This taking back of the night also opened up my evenings to some fairly intensive writing, after an innocent inquiry from a friend as to how my manuscript was going and some gentle, if not completely intentional, prodding from the señor.
[click to continue…]
It’s my hope that if you’re reading this it’s because you’ve followed the redirection from my old home at wordpress.com. I hope that those of you kind enough to link to that site will update your links to here. *
As with any move, my attention at the moment is held by the bright shiny newness of it all, so it may be a day or two before I begin the usual reflective writing for which I am known across the prairies of the internet.
Let me tantalise you in the meantime by contending I have fewer than five thousand more words to write before my manuscript is complete: final draft, reading for final editing. Once I began, at the prompting of the señor and a friend or two, to move around large blocks of text, the thing began to take shape much as a puzzle might unexpectedly near completion. I am quite pleased with it, but that could be the result of a summer’s break.
CP
*2249 ETA: I’ll also be cross-posting from here to my old LiveJournal (primarily just because I can), for those of you who prefer to read my entries there.
With a lighter teaching load this intake I have the opportunity, in terms of time at least, to do some [hushed tones] primary research, that ephemeral pastime whose presence connects to my working life much in the same way that reading under the blankets with a torch in the dark, aged nine or ten, does to everyday daylight reading.
I am, perhaps unsurprisingly, revisiting some of the close readings I made of Robin Hyde’s fiction, almost twelve years ago now. Through this, I happened on the below-quoted which I share with you, since it made me so laugh: [click to continue…]
We all know that the internet is for porn, but it is also for poetry. The amount of time I have ignored, more or less, the latter of these two facts is perhaps surprising, given the extent to which my ability to make my living has been contingent on making contentions about poems and poetics. Indeed, my writing life started as poet and prose stylist in equal parts, the adolescent rip-tides of Feelings and Self-Expression driving only slightly off-course my attention to form in both these modes.
[click to continue…]
The señor has been listening to the original version of “Louie Louie”, not The Kingsmen’s famous mumbler, but the one written and sung by Richard Berry. He points out the tender phrasing, the quasi-Jamaican lilt, the simple happy love story it evokes.
Edit: embedding is disabled on the Berry video: go here to see it.
[click to continue…]
Cross-pollination
22 September, 2008
in O internet, commentatrix, in Aotearoa, teaching & learning, the social round, writing & research
I have non-teaching time, at this, the sweetest time of year. Most of Concrete University, and much of Sockburn too, is heavy with blossom. Individual petals blow in drifts across lawns, adhering to my clothes and hair, the north face of the house and in the ears and up the noses of unsuspecting puppies. A few days of rain at the end of last week made the gutters run with lemon-coloured pollen water. The return of the sunshine is such that, though eyes stream and grow puffy on people and animals alike, the whole of the western suburbs seems to be strolling about, amiably, in short sleeves, asking itself how nice it is to see the sunshine.
[click to continue…]
{ 5 comments }