Simon at South America Bidsta has an interesting post on the relationship between the positioned individual and the ethnographic research they produce, noting drily that in “any other science, you might just call this ‘being transparent about one’s methods’”.
The post contains the challenge to reproduce the researcher’s exercise: to “write down ten things about ourselves–personal, political, demographic, academic or philosophical, that give an idea of who we are and where we come from, and that could influence how we carry out our research”. This challenge catches my attention for a number of reasons at present. The main one of these is that I am involved in a group research project at work to which I am not contributing in the way I anticipated I would be able to contribute. Tasks which I complete with ease in literary and cultural studies I find myself almost paralysed by in educational research. Furthermore, a misconceived sense of responsibility towards my research partners also seems to retard the pace of my work. (This is not to say that a sense of responsibility is in itself a bad idea, but rather that there’s something about the way in which I’m experiencing it that’s askew.)
So I’m up for completing Simon’s exercise with the slant that it’s a good time to reflect a little on how my own positioning as a researcher is affecting my contribution to this research project: I’m completing tasks quite different from those I thought I would when the project began.
[click to continue…]
The week just passed was enrolment week, when campus is rapidly shaken awake from its summer torpor. Even though the week’s events don’t in theory have a direct impact on my daily responsibilities, it’s been hard not to feel by proxy the stress of my colleagues. A particular kind of brittle cheer seeps through the floors and walls and imbues us all; our attention spans are a little shorter and our laughter a little louder and triggered by not much at all.
For the first time in my working life at preparatory programmes I am not facing a semester mad with contact hours, thanks both to some fairly assertive negotiating at my last development and review meeting and to the serendipity of a small research project coming under our auspices about now. For one day a week, I am being paid to do research, even if is literature reviews in a field not directly my own. I did not think I would ever achieve such a balance of first-semester hours, especially as colleagues around me add up their own personal tally and cry out aloud at the number.
[click to continue…]
My fellow Norwich Terrier breeder and Facebook friend Magda has included me in the “25 things” exercise that is currently meshing with the tag option on Facebook’s notes. This is the rubric
Rules: Once you’ve been tagged, you are supposed to write a note with 25 random things, facts, habits, or goals about you. At the end, choose 25 people to be tagged. You have to tag the person who tagged you. If I tagged you, it’s because I want to know more about you.
I am modifying this a little: since my Facebook notes are syndicated from my webpages, I am making the original post there, and since my Facebook friends are from so many different times and facets of my life, I am going to write five paragraphs for five things. Those of you who’ve been my students will know my mantra “an academic paragraph is usually around five sentences”, and it’s time for me to test it here. I will reserve the option to tag, knowing that many among you dislike it.
[click to continue…]
The exploration of Orientalism that the students and I conduct typically ends with a partial examination of this film, which is difficult to say the least. I present it as an example of the ways in which Orientalism can work inside territories to which Orientalism is also applied.
Thus you get a film made in an Orientalising manner about people–young, would-be suicide bombers–who describe the world in similarly essentialised, dichotomous and hierarchical terms. While the ideology within the film is relatively easy to pinpoint, the ideologies that shape the film are more slippery. It’s quite a challenging task.
[click to continue…]
Table of the Elements
12 May, 2009
in commentatrix, teaching & learning
There’s always plagiarism in my courses, usually from people who are running out of time, or who anticipate gaps in their knowledge of what they want to cover with their writing, or who don’t believe in their ability to turn a phrase of their own on the topic at hand. I’m more-or-less confident, these days, that I always catch it. Many students expect to get caught, but feel it’s the only chance they’ve got at creating something that might pass.
[click to continue…]
{ 2 comments }