Anniversary Labours

17 February, 2010

in O internet, at home, commentatrix, dogs, in Aotearoa, we are family

Adventures with Average Baby

This spring-and-summer pregnancy is already twice the length of its winter predecessor, and as different, thereby, as two things of the same kind can be.  Not least among these differences was the way in which we passed the first eleven weeks in a kind hopeful lockdown, wary to put too much pressure on the future to carry hope that might yet be redundant again.

The brain, the spine, the beating heart that was our gift before Christmas opened the door to a different kind of experience, territory as unknown as the very notion of being pregnant was the first time around.  The tremendous good fortune whereby my morning sickness (a most inadequate moniker) receded by New Year has given me back my old ability to think about anything other than how terrible I feel (and the accompanying certainty that nobody understands or cares sufficiently) and something of a hopeful forward-gaze.

July is the start of Terra Nullius (or hitherby dragons, as [info]hungrymama so elegantly put it recently), a blank, unscheduled space in which we all try to do the best we can with the resources that we have.  Until then, there is work, family and puppies to which to tend, not to mention the general stretching and expansion of me.  And today we had our anatomy scan, with its miscellany of organs, bones and limbs, all of which were present and average-sized, sweet words to our reasonable ears.  Against, it seems, the proprieties of the general public, we also now know which sex to gender.

Anniversaries

Our winter pregnancy had the due date of Valentine’s Day 2010, which caught my imagination before and after the fetus died.  This may have been the lasting trace of A.S. Byatt’s novel Still Life*, which I read in 1997 and whose tragic mother, Stephanie, bore a daughter on Valentine’s Day.  (The brutal dénouement of that novel changed permanently my relationship with narrative fiction, but that is another story for another post.)  However, it may also have been that as an anniversary baby myself, I liked the idea of having another with a feast day for a birthday.  The approach of this date in this new year has been a hard thing, despite carrying that lost child’s successor, and symbolised in just one or two objects: the first scan that sits in the online file in my name and a toy that the señor bought after the first news and set aside after the second.

We planned our own small memorial at a juvenile family grave , to put aside the toy among the elements as we did my hospital admission bracelets last winter.  This had to be brief by necessity as I was to be on labour watch over Fern, herself drawing closer to her own lying in.  The pressure of being a small dog carrying four whelps intervened, however, and my wee bitch delivered on Saturday, a few days shy of her due date, the first pup succumbing to the still birth of a stuck whelp early in the morning and the remaining three taking post-Caesarean breaths in the early afternoon.  Newborn puppies do not have flip-top heads, but the sight of their breathing inevitably makes me think of that old image, while their lungs inflated with air whose efficient respiration belied their litter-brother’s sad earlier fate.

By these events pups live and dead superseded a lost baby and our attention turned completely and necessarily to the recuperation of Fern and her care of the puppies, who thus far thrive.  The loss of a whelp is a common enough event in the animal world, but does not I think get any easier for those involved in husbandry.  I do not presume to anthropomorphise my dogs (other than in jest), but mammals we all are.  Handling the stillborn pup, including a long attempt at resuscitation, was something like occupational therapy for my next-day anniversary which we did not observe as planned.  What if, I said to the señor, we gave that memorial toy to the surviving puppies when they are a little bigger.  That, he said, is an idea.

The Pregnant Imagination

The estimable Julie has made a recent post at The Hand Mirror discussing which cultural objects, particularly films, might best be avoided during pregnancy.  (This follows her earlier sceptical charting of one MP’s catalogue of a nostalgic utopia in which pregnant women ate all the blue cheese and cold rice salads for which they could wish, and no-one’s fetus, presumably, ever succumbed to listeriosis.)  I have been thinking about this in relation to my own experiences, and the changes in what I do and don’t enjoy in art and culture, since this pregnancy began.

Most notably, I cannot tolerate the gothic and the dark I once so loved.  I say this as someone who once knew most of the words to “O’Malley’s Bar”, and who thought Election 2 the superior of its predecessor precisely because of the abattoir massacre scene that made its lead character so abhorrent.  Can’t, won’t, don’t want to see that anymore.  Along with this, my taste for conceptual art seems also to have receded.  If I go near a gallery, I want the bright colours of modernist abstraction or regionalist plumbing of people and places.  This coincides with a retreat from ambiguity more generally.  Those who have to read my academic prose might say, about time, but I no longer see the perfect performance as one that suggests more than one thing (Billie Holiday’s version of “Do Nothing Till You Hear From Me” still excepted).

Inevitably, perhaps, my imagination already dwells in a world of bright colours, small objects, and nouns relentlessly appended with diminutive suffixes: here are the puppies nursing Fernie; there are the baby’s leggies on the scan.  I spit demands at the long-suffering señor, who makes toast, cleans the kitchen and keeps calm in the face of a domestic capriciousness that lightly appals me even as I say the words.  (Case in point: we came home from North Otago to find Jaws the featured film of the evening.  I insisted not only that it be turned off, but also that a suitable substitute be found; eventually we located Casablanca.  Having achieved the correct aesthetic balance in the living room, I went to bed, unaware until the señor quietly pointed it out of the fuss made over television I didn’t intend to watch.)  I cannot be ironic with any efficacy, the psyche’s response, I suspect, to the fact of carrying a literal baby.  All this is a remaking of identity, and not a minor one, but to be frank I don’t care.  I’ll wallow in ballads and colours and puppies and look hopefully to things being okay.

Well, I kept thinking about what the weatherman said
And if the voices of the living can be heard by the dead
Well, the day is gonna come when we find out
In some kind of way I take a little comfort from that …

‘Cause people often talk about being scared of change
But for me I’m more afraid of things staying the same
‘Cause the game is never won
By standing in any one place for too long.

*(This volume is one of a tetralogy about the Potter family, which tempted me to call this post “[Harry] Potter and the Pregnant Imagination”. However, even a limited wit should know its limits.)

{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }

Emma 17 February, 2010 at 21:27

I love Byatt, but the manner of Stephanie’s death has always bugged me. I’d love to read what you have to say on the Virgin in the Garden novels.
The last post by Emma was Hard News: Research Fail

Reply

harvestbird 17 February, 2010 at 22:08

One of my favourite things about Virgin in the Garden was, a little shallowly perhaps, the cover design for the Vintage edition — so much so that I have a copy of the cover on my notice board at work. There are a number of scenes that have stayed with me over time from that novel, specifically Stephanie’s dream when she decides to marry and not to return to Cambridge, Alexander’s repinning of her hat at her wedding, and Frederica’s realisation that just because she’s having sex with someone, doesn’t mean she has to do it the way they say she should, or let them have open access to her mind. The last of these always seemed to me particularly good (indirect) advice to young women, and made me think there would be advantages in reading the novel even if one were a little young to take in its volume of content.

Reply

harvestbird 17 February, 2010 at 22:11

I’d also add that what infuriated me most about Stephanie’s death was that Byatt was having a buck each way: on the one hand, it occurs in the most random of circumstances, but on the other she opens the damn novel with the epigraph from Bede of which Stephanie’s death becomes the literal version. Furthermore, I object to the phrase “And then the refrigerator struck”: is it ironic or sincere? Still upset about it, thirteen years later!

Reply

Emma 18 February, 2010 at 10:36

I found the metaphorical weight of the fridge a bit heavy. And it had to be deliberately so, because we know Byatt can have a much lighter touch than that. But yes, it hadn’t gone far enough to say, this is irony, you’re supposed to find this funny. (There are other ways Byatt annoys me, but in ways I understand the purpose of, like her lack of resolved endings and her habit of skipping the “interesting bits” – most notably when the story resumes and Frederica has married and had a kid in the interim.)

I am, as is probably unsurprising, a big fan of Frederica.
The last post by Emma was Hard News: Research Fail

Reply

Msconduct 20 February, 2010 at 18:11

I saw a recent interview Mark Lawson did with AS Byatt on UK TV in which she talked about this. She said, essentially, that she had copped unending flak for the death, both its seeming randomness and its (ha!) execution. She explained that it came from a couple of wellsprings: one was, unlikely as it sounds, the same thing happening to her (without the fatal ending, obviously), and the other was the sudden and tragic death of her eleven year old son, who was hit by a drunk driver. She said it didn’t occur to her that the fridge thing would strike anyone as ridiculously unlikely since it had actually happened, and she is also inevitably preoccupied with the randomness and cruelty of death in real life, as opposed to the more usual literary kind of death, for obvious reasons.
The last post by Msconduct was

Reply

harvestbird 27 February, 2010 at 12:22

I feel a bit sorry for Byatt at the thought of readers giving her such a hard time. I always considered my reaction my problem, not hers! I think The Virgin in the Garden may have been dedicated to her son?

Reply

Deborah 18 February, 2010 at 01:16

I’m so pleased that all is going well with l’enfant.
The last post by Deborah was Bloody hell!

Reply

Jane 18 February, 2010 at 06:24

I love this post with its entwinings…

Reply

Giovanni 18 February, 2010 at 09:52

Oh indeed. And so moving.
The last post by Giovanni was Human Terrain

Reply

merc 18 February, 2010 at 10:37

Your writing takes me to places I happily follow to, and with just reward, your happiness becomes mine.
The last post by merc was Wandering.

Reply

Paul Litterick 18 February, 2010 at 21:01

I too love this post’s entwinings. I also love Do Nothing Till You Hear From Me, and its ambiguity. I am also quite pleased that your taste for conceptual art has been replaced my Modernist abstraction and bright colours. And I too am so pleased that all is going well with l’enfant.
The last post by Paul Litterick was Send in the Cones

Reply

Leave a Comment

Additional comments powered by BackType

Previous post:

Next post: